EDITORIAL.- The news that Queen Elizabeth II had banned the use of the Gais Grindr contacts app at Buckingham Palace is circulating in the LGTBI media and by some generalists such as the Daily Mail.
Apparently the palace police considers that the use of this type of applications "Can compromise the safety of the Monarch" and that "Has out of control" the entrances and exits of companions of palace workers ». Apparently the security department of the Queen had already warned the workers more than 800 among which are waiters, bodyguards, butlers, cleaning and kitchen staff, about the risk involved in using these App.
What is not clear is the protocol of visits of the workers of Buckingham Palace, since although they are explicitly forbidden to bring guests to the palace, it seems they are allowed to enter them in their private rooms, passing, however, an entrance control and departure. Honestly you do not understand, can they or can not they receive visitors? And if so, what kind of visits? Because what seems to worry the palace police is "The number of guests of officials who spend the night in the palace, especially with those who have just met". The same source informs that, from the prohibition of this type of App., Will be guardians of the palace those who control the entrances and exits. The subject is still not understood, are not they supposed to be doing it already?
Only at the end of the text can you read that other contact applications by geolocation will also be prohibited.
Honestly, it seems legitimate that the visits out of control of strangers in a place as sensitive to national security as the residence of the Monarch, be supervised especially. And if this implies prohibiting the use of geo locators or revising the protocol of visits, it also seems reasonable.
Particularly worried about the alarmism that is created by highlighting only Grindr's ban and not making it clear that it is not only intended to control the Gais workers, but also heterosexual contacts would be under suspicion. If there really is a homophobic slope in this whole matter should be denounced, but if not the case, who should be asked for explanations is the media that have disseminated the news with information gaps interested. They would be incurring in that newspaper saying "Do not ever let a news cancel you a good headline".
Editorial Gayles.tv
Online TV
